So I have had a couple posts drafted about “Climate Change” and “Global Warming” and “Greenhouse Gases” for a long time.
For anyone unfamiliar with where I stand on the subject, here is a quick post about the guy who invented the “hockey stick” theory for “global warming” that Al Gore jumped all over! Michael Mann is now suing a Canadian writer and threatening to destroy America’s most precious freedom!
Here is another on “climate change” and why I hate correlating it to pollution. I just want to promote that we decrease pollution and I don’t want to jump on any scientific bandwagon to do so. I want to use common sense and say “Hey, breathing in chemicals is bad for my health and all life on earth, let’s stop making so damn much of it!”
What’s my problem with Climate Change?
First, the idiot politicians, starting with Al Gore, who are using it to tax the shit out of the middle class. More recently, Alberta elected a socialist d-bag I will now refer to as Rachel Nutley and Canada is being run by an unemployable drama teacher living off his father’s inheritance, now referred to as Justin TruDOH.
These two quacks went to the Paris climate conference last month with the nation’s entourage. I don’t know what to say about this except who the #&!% do you asshats think you are? You are travelling on tax dollars and you are sending more Canadians than Americans, British and Australians combined. Hell we only have 13 less representatives at the event than the French and they are hosting it!
The French aren’t paying for 383 flights, 1000 hotel room nights or 3000 meals. What the hell were these idiots thinking? It is hilarious that the City of Vancouver says that the costs won’t be that substantial because most of it is being paid for by lobbyists. In what world is that better?
We all know what I think of the voters in Vancouver (and Montreal and Toronto).
This is “settled science”
Some ass-hat actually said this to me on Facebook this week. Do you even know what science is?
- Scientist observes something in nature… apple falls from tree
- Scientist comes up with theory… Galileo 1564-1642 “gravitational theory” (based on Aristotle’s work)
- Other scientists try to disprove the theory
- If they can, they come up with new theories
- If they can’t come up with an alternate theory then the initial one becomes accepted
- Ideally, some scientist provides a proof… Isaac Newton’s 1687 “law of universal gravitation” which we then use to discover Neptune.
- Scientists continue proving the “Law” or IMPROVING it… Einstein’s 1915 theory of general relativity
Understand, with this model, we have made leaps and bounds in the scientific community but you also have to understand that we don’t always believe scientists, or we didn’t in the past. For over 1000 years scientists knew the earth was round but people thought it was flat until even after Christopher Columbus tried sailing around it.
So what kind of ‘settled science’ have scientists tried passing off as fact because no other scientist could disprove it?
Phrenology? Phlogiston? Spontaneous generation? Luminiferous aether? The planet Vulcan? and now Global Warming?
How about the expanding Earth theory vs. the theory of plate tectonics? We talk about plate tectonics because it makes so much sense but there is actually no proof that plates shifted to move continents. It is just the best working theory of our day… today.
Keep in mind that since ancient Greeks like Aristotle (384 BC – 322 BC) proposed the geocentric model, and nobody could come up with a better working theory, mankind universally believed that the Earth was the center of the Solar System. That made sense and was “settled science” for 1500 years!
It was so ‘settled’ and the Roman Catholic Church so believed in it, that Galileo, who was friends with Pope Urban VIII from his college days, was almost burned at the stake for publishing his work. He was forced to recant his theory and lived the rest of his days under house arrest. Nice science eh?
Remember that Galileo was the first man to actually have proof since he was using a new invention called the telescope to actually document his theories. But that kind of stuff can’t sway a small mind from following the political aspirations of some charismatic asshat… like Gore, Obama, Nutley and Trudoh.
Don’t argue data in the comments below… send those comments to Tony’s blog… he eats that shit up and really loves this research and knowing more about the science than the scientists.
Are you smarter than every scientist in the world?
About their science? Not even close.
Do I have more common sense? In my thumbnail.
Someone is going to post a list of Scientific groups from NASA to Greenpeace saying how “settled” the science is but I can’t dismiss findings from people like Gunter Ederer who claim that NASA has manipulated their own data sets to make the earth look like it is warming when their actual numbers show it is cooling.
It is not like our government has never lied before.
For the record, guys like Coby Beck have lists all over… these liberals are going to have some tough back-peddling to do because they just jump on bandwagons and kiss their credibility goodbye.
I will listen to guys like John Coleman (founder of The Weather Channel) before a politician, or scientist who depends on a politician for grants. But here is a man with something to lose by speaking his mind…
I have studied this topic seriously for years. It has become a political and environment agenda item, but the science is not valid.
~ John Coleman
I am not saying that “Greenhouse Gases” don’t exist, I am just saying that I can’t believe that they can heat up the earth. This actually defies common sense.
This is probably the stupidest hoax I have seen in my lifetime. The very idea that the atmosphere is being filled with a greenhouse gas is not nuts. By definition, this is stopping radiation emitted by the earth from leaving and thus warming up the planet.
So let’s stop emitting CO2 into our atmosphere. Wait a second, doesn’t our world need CO2 for something? Oh yah, Photosynthesis! That is right, CO2 get used by green plants to produce O2, which is Oxygen. Who needs Oxygen again? I do! And so do these Psycho Liberal Housewives who have nothing to do all day except get on social media and propagate political propaganda about “greenhouse Gases”.
Alternate Theory that actually makes sense?
So let’s try this out for size… you cover all the glass in your greenhouse with tin foil to reflect heat, just like a greenhouse gas.
“Global Warming” liberal whiners would start to complain because the heat from inside (body heat, plant heat, earth radiation, etc.) is being trapped inside and can’t escape. I do not disagree (that the heat won’t escape or that they are whiners.
The flaw in this theory is that you somehow believe that the sun’s radiation is still going to get in. The tin foil is going to stop that too. Please tell me that you agree that the atmosphere gets more heat via radiation from the sun than back from the earth.
If you agree with this, how on earth is your greenhouse gas allowing sun heat in but not earth heat out? The fact of the matter is that greenhouse gases are going to cause an ice age and not anything remotely similar to global warming… if they do anything at all.
If you don’t believe me, stop being such a damn idiot… okay, maybe that was harsh. How about you stop being such a hypocrite? Here is a proof from NASA (and we know how much you love them). It is not anything they will admit changes their theory of climate change, but a great proof for people like me looking for an alternative that makes sense.
Greenhouse gases saved us in 2012 from huge solar radiation which COOLED the earth. They claim that there was so much heat in the upper atmosphere, being bounced back by greenhouse gases, that satellites were slowing down.
I am not saying that “Global Warming” isn’t a theory, I am saying that it isn’t a very good one and the science backing it is very flimsy… we simply haven’t got enough historical data to say what historically has happened.
In my own personal life I have been to the Columbia Icefield where the Athabasca Glacier has had documented recession since 1840. You can go there and see the signs of where the ice was at specific years. This did NOT start in 1992 as these “Global Warming” pundits would have us believe.
Do I believe in climate change? Of course I do! I live in Canada where the climate changes every hour. But I sure as hell have no effect on it and I don’t believe that the other 7 Billion of you do either!
The global temperature is dropping anyhow so who cares? Canadians do (except Nutley and Trudoh).
It is Weather assholes! Stop trying to get government grants by coming up with science that proves it is our fault. We are talking about weather! It changes. Hence, “climate… change”. Did you see that correlation?
Is it only in Canada that we have meteorologists who predict the weather 7 days out and are running an incredible inaccuracy rate of 100% for never predicting the right weather?
Let me see if I have this straight… you understand that we as humans do not have the technology to predict what the hell is going to fall from the sky in 7 days but you think that we are breathing too much and melting the polar ice caps? Seriously? You are a little full of yourself to think that we have that kind of power if I do say so.