Several provinces have expressed interest in leaving Canada, many people are talking about becoming states and many more are talking about forming their own country. The simple fact is that Canada is broken. Many believe that it is not a country that should exist any longer in its current form. This isn’t about how the RCMP, Canada’s national police force, consistently shows the people and provinces how it works for Ottawa, and not Canadian’s or the provinces they are deployed in. It is not about the corruption or incompetence in all levels of government. It’s not about how rigged elections are for the areas that support liberal ideas. It’s not even about how divided the country is from the far left to the far right ideologically.
The biggest problem with Canada right now is that they haven’t had a real leader in over a decade. The ruler of any country should have one main goal, to protect their people. You protect them by securing their safety, economic well-being, and foreign image so they can travel safely.
A ruler can only have so much impact on the economy. If the world is going to shit, you are going to feel it. There was a recession in 2008 but most Canadians didn’t even know about it until they made a movie about it because Canada had an economist for a Prime Minister back then. Canada typically runs its foreign policy in line with the UK and USA. They are effective helpers and people around the world typically think highly of Canada.
What about the physical safety of Canadian citizens? At this point, the government and justice system don’t seen to give a single care in the world about the safety of Canadians. There are numerous cases over the past decade where the government has acted more fascist than democratic for sure. The government outlawed peaceful protests at one point, and seized the bank accounts of people who donated to the protestor cause. People need to feel like their government has their back.
That is not the case in Canada.
Ontario Court Justice Paul Thomas O’Marra has made a mockery of Canada’s justice system by releasing a man who was charged with attempting to pay for sex with a 15-year-old girl.
The problem is that there was no defense. The guy was busted telling the police that if things worked out they could have a long relationship. Then the judge let him go because the criminal conviction would affect his immigration status and his ability to sponsor his wife to stay in Canada with him.
First, why is his wife wanting to be with him? More importantly, why is this even a question? This man, Akashkumar Narendrakumar Khant, should have been on a plane back to India before the sun set on his day in court. Instead, Judge O’Marra has told the Canadian people, that the safety of their young daughters is secondary to the convenience of immigrants who want to sexually assault them!
You can read the story here with an Indian perspective (yes, they are just as disgusted by our lack of humanity for young girls), or the Canadian version in the National Post with much the same conclusion. You won’t see much more about this due to the liberal government’s influence on the corrupt and ineffective mainstream media.
I am used to Canadians getting the shaft due to horrific immigration policies that have placed the interests of immigrants over Canadians for most of the past decade or more but I have a real problem with this story due to the Justice in the case.
Ontario Court Justice Paul Thomas O’Marra needs to be held to account by whatever judicial body is in place. Canada’s criminal code makes it illegal to buy sex from a 15-year-old – but we are a nation of case law so when a judge does something this stupid, it can be used to free immigrants in the future. Can we have a serious conversation here about what common sense approach should be taken?
Should the judge be disciplined with unpaid vacation days?
Should the judge be removed from the bench?
Should Paul Thomas O’Marra be charged with obstructing justice by ignoring the laws we have in place?
Should this person be in prison for using his position to willfully put the lives of Canadians at risk?
Now what should happen to the Prime Minister who does nothing about it?
A2Z with ADHD 
When will the most people see that they are helpless without the God they claim to serve?
God has tried to get our attention (for over 30-yrs that I am aware of) and recently God mentioned to me that His judgment is now beginning according to Romans 2.9.
We often escape the plans of satan because of God’s protection, BUT when God brings His judgment the people will either admit their failing before and to God, or fall under it – in any case, God is JUSTICE – among other things also.
Clearly there is not enough God left in Canada. Too many Canadians would disagree with me.
Shayne, you’re right— but imo, Canada hasn’t just now broken. It’s been broken for years because sentencing has steadily grown more lenient. Whether the parallel decline of religion is a coincidence or not, the end result is the same. And the Khant case didn’t break the system, it just exposed the cracks more clearly: Judge Paul O’Marra still gives him a conditional discharge—no record if he plays nice.
Worth noting too: O’Marra didn’t come up as a criminal lawyer. His background was mainly in family law. And yet, once you’re on the Ontario Court bench, you’re expected to handle criminal, family, and provincial offences alike. Many judges walk in without deep criminal expertise, which is why one can hear stories of judges literally asking counsel on record what the law says or how to rule that day.
Lawyers frame the battlefield; judges just referee with whatever’s been put in front of them. That even opens the door to behind-the-scenes influence, whether through ex-parte whispers or politics.
And also, in this case, O’Marra leaned on recent case law where the mandatory minimum sentence was already struck down, plus Supreme Court precedent that told judges to weigh immigration fallout. He didn’t invent leniency out of nowhere—the system handed him the rope, and Lady Justice was the one left hanging.
So whether one calls it compassion or systemic rot of the bench, it goes way beyond one judge’s résumé. It speaks to a justice culture where the guilty are spared, the victims are punished, and the real decisions are often being steered long before the gavel drops.
At the end of the day, a prime minister can’t overturn a judge, and judges can’t be charged for bad rulings either—and removals almost never happen except in cases of outright misconduct. In this case, even the appeal was denied. So we’re left with a system that shields its own, a system built to protect itself and not the victims—and it’s been heading that way for a while.
Wise words. I cannot argue with a thing you wrote.